More Pages: Norman Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


a gem of a book
Starting Riding

Great for K-2 soccer players and their parents
Great for the young student and young teacher of soccerThis book is great for kids who need something to learn from and it is great for a coach who needs a quick and easy method of bringing a lesson plan together.
Good work!


long overdue!
A fascinating, entertaining, fully engaging read

A suspenseful read
Terrific romantic suspense! A real page-turner

Jaffe -- Madman or Media "Anchor-droid"?Harold Jaffe doesn't say the right thing...everyone's [ticked] off...
Why does he do this? He likes animals; why doesn't he just write Call of the Wild II?
He does it because he can't help it. You see, "If you have love enough, then go on, rage, rage out of love." And Jaffe loves enough. And so he rages. He rages against a society he finds largely unsupportable, bloated, greedy, ravenous, jealous, demanding, hypocritical, entrenched, bulletproof, painted with hypnotic DAY-GLO colors.
Jaffe uses the same tactics as the media-frenzy culture we live in. He writes with a merciless efficiency and swiftness. He intrudes upon us with unidentified, disembodied voices, like in "Necro," parroting the in-your-face media fixation and regurgitation of warped "reality" programming. He doesn't linger on any aspect of his story for too long. He lights from flower to flower. Fast, list-like stories like "Carjack," "14 Ways of Looking at a Serial Killer," and "Things to do During Times of War" echo the need for the national attention-span to please not be stressed for anything longer than what would normally be broken, mediated, by a Word from Our Sponsors...Many readers would turn their ire back upon the author. But Jaffe's provocations are intentional. He's trying to get the reader stirred up, and then, hopefully, to examine this agitation and seek its actual source - the culture we live in, for that, in so many ways, is what is insupportable...
Jaffe seeks to get us riled up, but unlike most fiction, he does not allow resolution, satisfaction, gratification. If we seek release, we must look within ourselves, examine our own thoughts, our own responses, our own reactions.
Jaffe's tales are so extreme, so hyperreal, because such extremity is necessary to disassociate the reader from such an intense media-saturated culture, thereby eliciting a state of mind where it becomes possible to examine the network while standing outside the network, instead of being asleep inside the network.
Unlike satire, which establishes a norm and then ricochets against it, Jaffe uses pastiche, in which culture is unflinchingly mimicked, broadcasting every contradictory datum, commenting on the absurdity of it all by providing no established foundation of normalcy; we are instead left to flounder in a wicked distillation of our everyday world, an experience so intense that we shudder, suddenly awakened to the sewage with which we are daily subsumed.
The most important message Harold Jaffe leaves us with is not one of his fictions, but in fact a Public Service Announcement he created for NBC's "The more you know" pre-advertisement segment. In it, Jaffe brilliantly explains to children and adolescents that sex is deadly. With equal deftness, he illustrates that commercial sex is very healthy. "Let the Corporations be your guide," Jaffe croons while plucking his banjo...
Cutting into the Body Politic

CD ROMbest regards Dr` Roman Korobochka MD
obstetrics,high-risk,maternal-fetal medicine

Very thorough, easy to understandAt a time when liberal scholarship is adrift in a sea of desperation, the cool, calm analysis and breadth of knowledge of Geisler is an asset to a faith in need of revitalisation and energising.
Like Todd Vick, I think Geisler is at his best on issues like inerrancy and inspiration, but his thorough background treatise on the varying paths of liberal and fundamental thought is just as vital to understanding where Christianity has been and where it's going.
Systematic Theology is highly recommended as a solid grounding for evangelicals. I'm looking forward to the next installment.
A Very Strong Introduction TextGeisler begins this volume (there are others to follow) with a section on the "preconditions" of theology. This is typical Geisler style (since he did this in the classroom as well) and I believe it strengthens the whole "doing" of theology. In like fashion, Geisler also includes philosophical and apologetical preconditions for doing theology. This is another feature that I thought set this text apart from others. Thus, in the "Introduction" alone, Geisler has set the stage for his "doing" theology quite well (I can't wait to read the volumes that follow).
From the "preconditions," Geisler then moves into biblical theology. Not theology that is biblical, but Bibliology, or perhaps better put, The Bible. This section covers the truth claims from and about the Scriptures, the history of the manuscripts, Church history and the Bible, and also those aberrant teachers and their teachings who try and distort or alter traditional views about the Bible. Geisler is pretty thorough in this section. Of course, I think that this issue (the Bible and its inerrancy) is one of Geisler's strongest fields of expertise.
This text is a great "Introduction" text. What I mean by this is not that the text is for beginners (while it is written clear enough to be understood by anyone who never studied the issues previously and also for those seasoned readers), but by "Introduction" I mean just what the text actually is. It is an introduction to his overall systematic theology series which is to follow this text.
There are several areas of controversy in the text itself (of a more philosophical nature). For instance, Geisler is very much a Gilsonian Thomist. As such, Geisler believes and teaches that "beings" have a real distinction between their being and their essence, but God does not have this real distinction. This is a very hot Thomistic topic in current philosophy of religion circles. The debate rages mainly between those Thomists who follow Gilson's teachings on this issue and those who side with Wippel. While Geisler does not touch on the issue as controversial, he does address it in nice Gilsonian fashion. And I for one am in agreement with Geisler (and Gilson) on this issue.
Overall, this is a great text which demonstrates Geisler abilities and knowledge in these specific areas. I look forward to the volumes that follow and I highly recommend this volume.


A Taste of the Elephant
Great book!

EXCELLENT
I loved it!!!

Faithful Companion for 20 Years
Life Changer